Pages

Tuesday 4 February 2014

Is Housing Loan Prepayment is a Good Option? Find out...



I have the opinion backed up by data that our housing loan EMI should not prepay and close before the tenure. 

Reasons are

1. Housing Loan is the long term loan and the interests are peanuts.
2. One house is enough for the individual and if they close the loan early then the chances of getting into another loan is very high.

Many Individual try to pre-close the EMI in 5 to 7 years and feel that they are saving good amount of  money not paying to Housing Loan Companies. I have input the data and how it works in a long term!

First of all, it is highly difficult to close it in 5 years, so I took 7 years for argument sake.

I have taken 50L housing loan and the EMI would be 49,919, at the rate of 10.5% and 20 years will be the term.

At the end of every year for the next 5 years, the individual is prepaying 5 Lakhs which itself is not an easy thing to do. In the 6th and 7th Year, it will be 8 Lakhs and beginning of the 8th year whatever 3.68 Lakhs which is left also be paid.

The difference in the EMI will be invested in PPF at the rate of 8.7% as suggested by her.

In other words, the individual is paying 49,919 for the next 20 years and keep reducing the housing loan and keep increasing the PPF. In addition to that from the 2nd year onwards, till 8th year he paid pre-payment around 44,68,926 and generating close to 2 Crore. Instead of prepaying if the same money is invested in a diversified mutual fund, I assumed two scenarios 1. 12% and 2. 15%

Months
EMI
Installments
Interest Paid
Pre Payment
PPF
ROI
Years
Value
No Prepayment
Future Value
1--12
49919
12
599028





Intest Assumption
Intest Assumption
13-24
44479
12
533748
500000
5440
8.70%
19
3,167,927
12.00%
15.00%
INR 4,306,381
INR 7,115,886
25--36
39547
12
474564
500000
4932
8.70%
18
2,576,717
12.00%
15.00%
INR 3,844,983
INR 6,187,727
37--48
34211
12
410532
500000
5336
8.70%
17
2,494,745
12.00%
15.00%
INR 3,433,020
INR 5,380,632
49--60
28756
12
345072
500000
5455
8.70%
16
2,275,680
12.00%
15.00%
INR 3,065,197
INR 4,678,810
61-72
23163
12
277956
500000
5593
8.70%
16
2,333,250
12.00%
15.00%
INR 3,065,197
INR 4,678,810
73-84
13994
12
167928
800000
9169
8.70%
14
3,013,439
12.00%
15.00%
INR 3,909,690
INR 5,660,565
85-96
4532
12
54384
800000
9462
8.70%
13
2,742,362
12.00%
15.00%
INR 3,490,794
INR 4,922,230



2863212
368926
4532
8.70%
13
1,313,505
12.00%
15.00%
INR 1,609,806
INR 2,269,923




4468926
49919


19,917,626


INR 26,725,068
INR 40,894,584
Total Amount Paid



7332138






INR 6,807,442
INR 20,976,957











Sixty Eight Lakhs
Two Crore 10 Lakhs

When the broad-base index itself delivered 17% CAGR for the past 34 years and if you add 1.5% as dividend yield, the very conservative return from the fund in the next 20 years would be 15%.

@12%, he will gain 68 Lakhs additional
@15%, he will gain 2.1 Crore additional

I think, I have not overlooked anything, in case if I have missed out anything, please inform me and I will revisit again.

Conclusion: To me, housing loan should continue till the tenure irrespective of the interest rate, which I keep telling for the past 3 years and I stand by this. 

No comments:

Post a Comment