I have the opinion backed up by data
that our housing loan EMI should not prepay and close
before the tenure.
Reasons are
1. Housing Loan is the long term loan
and the interests are peanuts.
2. One house is enough for the
individual and if they close the loan early then the chances of getting into
another loan is very high.
Many Individual try to pre-close the EMI in 5
to 7 years and feel that they are saving good amount of money not paying to Housing Loan Companies. I
have input the data and how it works in a long term!
First of all, it is highly difficult
to close it in 5 years, so I took 7 years for argument sake.
I have taken 50L housing loan and the
EMI would be 49,919, at the rate of 10.5% and 20 years will be the term.
At the end of every year for the next
5 years, the individual is prepaying 5 Lakhs which itself is not an easy thing
to do. In the 6th and 7th Year, it will be 8 Lakhs and beginning of the 8th
year whatever 3.68 Lakhs which is left also be paid.
The difference in the EMI will be
invested in PPF at the rate of 8.7% as suggested by her.
In other words, the individual is
paying 49,919 for the next 20 years and keep reducing the housing loan and keep
increasing the PPF. In addition to that from the 2nd year onwards, till 8th
year he paid pre-payment around 44,68,926 and generating close to 2 Crore. Instead
of prepaying if the same money is invested in a diversified mutual fund, I
assumed two scenarios 1. 12% and 2. 15%
Months
|
EMI
|
Installments
|
Interest Paid
|
Pre Payment
|
PPF
|
ROI
|
Years
|
Value
|
No Prepayment
|
Future Value
|
||
1--12
|
49919
|
12
|
599028
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intest Assumption
|
Intest Assumption
|
||
13-24
|
44479
|
12
|
533748
|
500000
|
5440
|
8.70%
|
19
|
3,167,927
|
12.00%
|
15.00%
|
INR 4,306,381
|
INR 7,115,886
|
25--36
|
39547
|
12
|
474564
|
500000
|
4932
|
8.70%
|
18
|
2,576,717
|
12.00%
|
15.00%
|
INR 3,844,983
|
INR 6,187,727
|
37--48
|
34211
|
12
|
410532
|
500000
|
5336
|
8.70%
|
17
|
2,494,745
|
12.00%
|
15.00%
|
INR 3,433,020
|
INR 5,380,632
|
49--60
|
28756
|
12
|
345072
|
500000
|
5455
|
8.70%
|
16
|
2,275,680
|
12.00%
|
15.00%
|
INR 3,065,197
|
INR 4,678,810
|
61-72
|
23163
|
12
|
277956
|
500000
|
5593
|
8.70%
|
16
|
2,333,250
|
12.00%
|
15.00%
|
INR 3,065,197
|
INR 4,678,810
|
73-84
|
13994
|
12
|
167928
|
800000
|
9169
|
8.70%
|
14
|
3,013,439
|
12.00%
|
15.00%
|
INR 3,909,690
|
INR 5,660,565
|
85-96
|
4532
|
12
|
54384
|
800000
|
9462
|
8.70%
|
13
|
2,742,362
|
12.00%
|
15.00%
|
INR 3,490,794
|
INR 4,922,230
|
|
|
|
2863212
|
368926
|
4532
|
8.70%
|
13
|
1,313,505
|
12.00%
|
15.00%
|
INR 1,609,806
|
INR 2,269,923
|
|
|
|
|
4468926
|
49919
|
|
|
19,917,626
|
|
|
INR 26,725,068
|
INR 40,894,584
|
Total Amount Paid
|
|
|
|
7332138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INR 6,807,442
|
INR 20,976,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sixty Eight Lakhs
|
Two Crore 10
Lakhs
|
When the broad-base index
itself delivered 17% CAGR for the past 34 years and if you add 1.5% as dividend
yield, the very conservative return from the fund in the next 20 years
would be 15%.
@12%, he will gain 68 Lakhs
additional
@15%, he will gain 2.1
Crore additional
I think, I have not overlooked
anything, in case if I have missed out anything, please inform me and I will
revisit again.
Conclusion: To me, housing loan
should continue till the tenure irrespective of the interest rate, which I keep
telling for the past 3 years and I stand by this.
No comments:
Post a Comment